Are LLMs essentially Teenagers?
Staff Pick

Are LLMs essentially Teenagers?

Use the behavior of teenagers as a metaphor to understand LLMs

Published Feb 29, 2024
Last Modified Mar 1, 2024


Diving into the world of Large Language Models (LLMs) might feel like trying to have a heart-to-heart with a teenager. Both come with their own unique capabilities and peculiarities in their use of language, sprinkled with moments of baffling decision-making. Imagine trying to untangle the world through the eyes of a teen—full of confidence, sometimes too much, ready to take on complex conversations but occasionally tripping over their own shoelaces. This piece takes a light-hearted yet insightful stroll through the similarities between the mysterious minds of LLMs and the unpredictable nature of teenage behavior.


Just like teenagers stepping into the big, wide world without much real-life experience under their belts, Large Language Models (LLMs) navigate the vast digital universe with a blend of overconfidence and, let's say, a vivid imagination. Both are in their formative years, so to speak, learning on the go and sometimes making decisions that leave us scratching our heads. This exploration into their common ground isn't just for fun—it sheds light on the quirks and capabilities of our AI counterparts.
Now, think about the last time you tried to follow the thought process of a teenager. Their decisions are shaped by a cocktail of factors: brain development, peer pressure, and personal experiences, to name a few. It's a puzzle that's tough to solve, mirroring the complexity of understanding how LLMs arrive at their conclusions. Even though feedback can guide them in new directions, peeling back the curtain to reveal the "why" behind their choices often feels like an exercise in guesswork.
Diving into conversations with Large Language Models (LLMs) or teenagers can sometimes feel like talking to someone who's convinced they know exactly where you're coming from—regardless of whether they actually do. Both LLMs and teens can come across as a bit too sure of themselves, often missing the mark on gauging the other person's level of expertise. LLMs, with their impressive language skills, still haven't mastered the art of recognizing who they're chatting with, much like a teenager confidently explaining the internet to a software engineer.
When it comes to learning, LLMs go through a kind of digital "growing up" that's reminiscent of human evolution but at hyper speed. They absorb vast oceans of text to get a grip on human chatter, a process that mirrors the slow, meticulous journey of human language development over millennia. This training is no small feat; it's a massive investment in understanding and mimicking the way we communicate. It highlights not just how LLMs learn to talk the talk but also puts into perspective the incredible journey of human language evolution—showing that both teenagers and AI have a lot of growing up to do, each in their own complex, sometimes overconfident way.
Just as teenagers navigate the tricky waters of growth, guided by the cheers and jeers from their world, Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI learn to refine their digital personas through feedback. It's a bit like how a teen lights up with a well-timed compliment or mulls over a piece of constructive criticism, adjusting their course slightly with each new piece of advice. LLMs, fed on a diet of endless data, tweak their responses and improve their chatter based on the digital applause or boos they receive. This process is akin to a teenager's journey of self-discovery and adaptation, absorbing life's lessons and evolving. Both LLMs and teens show us the power of feedback—not just in shaping AI's ability to communicate, but in reminding us of the timeless act of learning from the responses we gather in day to day communication.


When it comes to solving a problem, Large Language Models (LLMs) act as digital detectives, sifting through mountains of data, applying intricate computational formulas to sniff out patterns and spit out answers. Their method is all about crunching numbers and matching patterns, which means while they often hit the nail on the head with contextually spot-on replies, figuring out the "why" behind their conclusions is a bit like trying to read tea leaves.
Then there are teenagers, whose approach to problem-solving is as layered as their personalities. Imagine them navigating a maze, where each turn is influenced by a mix of sharp cognitive skills, the social compass set by their peers, and the rich tapestry of their personal experiences. Their decisions emerge from a blend of thought, education, personal growth, and social interaction—making for a problem-solving style that’s holistic and grounded in experience.
While LLMs dissect problems with the precision of a computer algorithm, teenagers tackle them with a depth that comes from living through experiences, feeling every high and low, and learning from the social world around them. This distinction highlights not just the difference in how they arrive at solutions, but the contrast between the logical, pattern-based reasoning of AI and the complex, emotionally rich decision-making of human beings.

Healthy Skepticism of their Output

In the world of advice-giving, both Large Language Models (LLMs) and teenagers hold a unique place. They're like eager helpers, ready to chime in with insights or solutions. However, taking their words as gospel might lead you down a rabbit hole. LLMs, for all their linguistic finesse, sometimes echo the biases and errors marbled throughout their vast training data. It's a bit like getting directions from a well-meaning friend who's never actually been to the place they're describing.
Teenagers, with their boundless energy and fresh perspectives, also come with their own set of disclaimers. Their advice, while often insightful, carries the limitations of their life experiences. It's like they're seeing the world through a kaleidoscope—vibrant and full of potential, yet not always clear or accurate.
Both LLMs and teens share a common trait: a confident exterior that doesn't always match up with the depth of their knowledge. This confidence, while admirable, can sometimes lead us astray, especially when it comes to sifting through the information they provide. LLMs don't always know when they're out of their depth, spinning out answers without the ability to critique their own sources. Teens, influenced by their social circles and their own budding self-assurance, might not always question their conclusions with the rigor needed.
Peeling back the layers to understand why they've landed on a certain piece of advice is another challenge. With LLMs, you're dealing with a black box of algorithms and data; with teenagers, a complex web of thoughts and influences. Both can leave you puzzled, trying to trace the path from question to answer.
Navigating the insights offered by both LLMs and teenagers requires a discerning eye. It's a dance of valuing their input while also recognizing the need for a pinch of skepticism and a healthy dose of follow-up questions.

Making Use Of This Insight

Navigating conversations with Large Language Models (LLMs) and teenagers can sometimes feel like trying to solve a mystery without all the clues. But, just like any good detective, knowing the right questions to ask can make all the difference. Being clear and specific in your queries, such as using prompts like "How did you come up with that?" or "Explain it like I'm 10," can turn a vague answer into a treasure trove of insights. It's about encouraging a deeper dive into their thought processes, whether you're dealing with a sophisticated AI or a savvy teen.
Asking for elaboration with phrases like "Can you tell me more about that?" or "Could you put that another way?" can also work wonders. These techniques don't just apply to extracting more meaningful responses; they're about fostering understanding and clarity, regardless of whether you're interpreting the output of an LLM or decoding the latest teen lingo.
And then there's the lighter side of the comparison—the investment. Training an LLM can be as financially overwhelming as planning for a teenager's college education. It's a humorous but apt analogy that highlights the cost and commitment behind these endeavors. Sometimes, opting for a less intensive route—a smaller AI model or a more affordable educational path—might not just save resources but also turn out to be the smartest choice in the long run. In both scenarios, the key is to weigh the return on investment carefully, reminding us that bigger or more expensive isn't always better.


The comparison between Large Language Models (LLMs) and teenagers isn't just witty banter; it's a gateway to a deeper understanding of the complexities we face when interacting with advanced AI. Recognizing their shared traits—like how they respond to feedback, their sometimes misplaced confidence, and the opaque nature of their decision-making—can equip us with a more layered approach to engaging with LLMs. This perspective helps peel back the curtain on the enigmatic world of artificial intelligence, revealing not just its potential but also its limitations.
Indeed, as we race to keep up with the breakneck pace of AI development, any tool that demystifies our "soon to be robot overlords" is invaluable. By embracing this analogy, we're not just making sense of LLMs; we're paving the way for the creation of ethical standards and effective strategies that harness the power of LLMs across various fields. This not only enhances our grasp of their behavior and skills but also ensures that as we move forward, we do so with a keen awareness of the responsibility that comes with wielding such transformative technology.